Skip to content
Friday, October 16, 2026
United Online

Could Other Countries Emulate Australia's Lead in Prohibiting Online Networks for Teenagers Under 16?

The nation's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring similar bans.

  • Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized next year.
  • Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an measures under consideration".
  • In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The authorities in the Netherlands has urged parents to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a good foundation," stated one European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and fit for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the regional level due to federal stalemate.

  • Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
  • Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
  • Virginia has passed a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, other states are similarly considering moves.

  • Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this global conversation continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are no longer content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.

About the author

Amy Crawford

Elara Vance is a digital strategist with over a decade of experience in tech journalism and online content creation.

United Online

Type to search articles.